爱情无限

原文标题：不要和穷女孩谈恋爱！
文章提交者：ibmibm007 加帖在 猫眼看人 【凯迪网络】 http://www.kdnet.net

我在’ http://club2.cat898.com/newbbs/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=1&ID=1716422 ‘跟贴写道：
1，不鼓励有才能的男子找穷人家的女儿。
2，有才能的男子必须找富人家的女儿。或者女孩子自己赚钱多也可以。
3，相信我：穷女孩是很少有真爱的。
结果遭来非议，于是有必要说明一下，这一切都是基于欧美盛行的’社会生物学“，并非我的独创------阐述一下我的观点：

    读过《社會生物學》(Sociobiology)相关数目的人，一般都能够在婚姻和爱情中直达目的获得成功（如果他还相信爱情和婚姻）。
    与‘人性激素论’不同，“社会生物学”强调，男女性别作为生物属性，具有不可逃脱的“阴阳属性”。
    以下是相关主要概念：
    1，女性在生理上的遗传决定，必须先解决物质基础，具备抚养儿女的物质条件后，才会产生爱情，否则会有严重的疑虑和焦躁情绪。为爱情牺牲生存条件的女性，在几百万年的生存竞争中，逐渐绝种了————古代的社会不具备女性养育儿女的条件，必须依靠男性。
    2，历史上，男性无论穷富，都具有生存后代的可能性。但女性，必须自己有钱，家里有钱，或者依靠男性才能生育后代，否则就是没有后代。
    3，前两条产生的后果是，到近代为止，男性和女性的基因已经进化到不可想象的地步。
    4，当社会发展到女性可以单独完成抚育孩子的时期时，人类女性基因，开始转向，但这是很漫长的过程，想要女性进化到“爱情第一，物质第二”的水准，需要至少10代人。
    5，目前发达国家社会发展到女性可以单独完成抚育孩子的时期已经好几代了，但是落后国家，女性依然无法单独完成抚育孩子。
    6，女性的富有程度，决定着女性对爱情的向往程度。换句话说，女性潜意识里，必须先获得养活孩子的物质，才会产生爱情，不这样想的女性的基因，早已经灭种了！
    7，从小就生活在富裕环境中的女性，即便长大后贫苦，爱情的向往依然存在，这是因为激素长期刺激大脑造成的类似杜平的感觉无法排除。
    8，幼年贫苦，长大后富裕的女性，渴望爱情的比例也比较大。
    9，女性在8-17岁的发育期的物质条件，对以后是否渴望爱情起决定作用。
    10，人类遗传发育，始终走女性上层路线，就是说物质条件比较好的女性，子女后代具有更高的智力和体力。
    11，在能养活后代的条件下，男性择偶的标准始终是健康和美丽，女性的标准始终却是比较全面的。
    12，再不具备养活后代古代的物质条件下，男性依然不顾一切，可望播种。播种后不养育子女。
    13，相反，从远古时代男性不对子女物质条件负责，女性必须想尽一切办法养活孩子。
    14，女性竞争决定民族和国家的强盛与否，男性竞争只能决定家族，女性竞争的后果是国家民族强大，男性竞争的后果是国破族亡。
    15，战后日本、德国、苏联之所以能很快发展起来，是因为女性竞争的缘故。
    其他的大家自己研究吧，我另外多数几句话：
并非100%的穷女孩不相信爱情，不过，对于家里穷，自己也穷，没有上进心的女孩，为了子孙后代，少碰为妙。

结论，作为男子，必须主动用一切手段，和以下上等女子结合：

上等女性的定位是：
1，父母有一方是高级人才，或者两者都是中级以上人才。
2，家里净资产超过20万美元（不包括住房折算）
3，自己考取注册会计师之类高端资格证书
4，类似《女人不哭〉里的女强人
5，发达国家居民
注意：本人不认可女性获得的学历，仅仅有学历是不够的，一方面，学历贬值了，另一方面是因为目前女性考取大学、研究生、博士生生远远超过男性的现象，是由于不公平考试内容造成的。

女人在没有能力养活小孩的前提下，几乎不会有纯粹的爱情，这是发展中国家每个男人都要面对的问题，回避意味着道德崩溃，无论男人还是女人，面对这个问题，必须做出选择。

最后，希望大家读一读以下参考书目，以便获得整体认识。
参考书目：
1，道金斯（Richard Dawkins）著，趙妙初譯，《 自私的基因──我們都是基因的俘虜？》（ The Selfish Gene），天下文化。
2. 柯若寧（Helera Cronin）著，楊玉齡譯，《 螞蟻與孔雀（上）──耀眼羽毛背後的性擇之爭》（ The Ant and the Peacock (Part 1 & 2) : Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today），天下文化。
3. 柯若寧（Helera Cronin）著，楊玉齡譯，《 螞蟻與孔雀（下）──捨自為群的利他之謎》（ The Ant and the Peacock (Part 3) : Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today），天下文化。
3. 賈德．戴蒙（Jared Diamond）著，王道還、廖月娟譯，《第三種猩猩──人類身世與未來》（ The third Chimpanzee : the Evolution and Future of the Human Animal），時報文化出版。
4. 賈德．戴蒙（Jared Diamond）著，王道還譯，《槍炮、病菌與鋼鐵──人類社會的命運》（ Guns, Germs and Steel : The Fates of Human Societies），時報文化出版。
5. 賈德．戴蒙（Jared Diamond）著，王道還譯，《 性趣何來？》（ Why is Sex Fun? : The Evolution of Human Sexuality），天下文化。
6. 麥特．瑞德里（Matt Ridley）著，范昱峰譯，《紅色皇后──性與人性的演化》（ The Red Queen : sex and the evolution of human nature），時報出版。
7. 羅伯．賴特（Robert Wright）著，林淑貞譯，《性．演化．達爾文──人是道德的動物？》（ The Moral Animal : Why We Are the Way We Are : the New Science of Evolutionary Psychology ），張老師文化。
8. 理查．藍翰（Richard Wrangham）和戴爾．彼德森（Dale Peterson）著，林秀梅譯，《雄性暴力──人類社會的亂源》（ Demonic Males : Apes and the Origins of Human Violence），胡挑木。
9. 法蘭克．薩洛威（Frank J. Sulloway），張定綺譯，《天生反骨──家庭內的演化爭戰》（ Born to Rebel
10. Edward O. Wilson, Sociobiology : The New Synthesis, Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Edition, Harvard Univ. Press (2000)
11. Edward O. Wilson, On Human Nature, Harvard Univ. Press (1988)
12. Edward O. Wilson, Consilience : The Unity of Knowledge, Random House (1999)
13. Richard Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype : The Long Reach of the Gene, Oxford Univ. Press (1990)
14. Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker : Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design, W W Norton & Co (1996)
15. Richard Dawkins, Climbing Mount Improbable, W W Norton & Co (1996)
16. Richard Dawkins, Unweaving the Rainbow : Science, Delusion, and the Appetite for Wonder, Houghton Mifflin Co (1998)
17. Susan J. Blackmore & Richard Dawkins, The Meme Machine, Oxford Univ. Press (1999)
18. Matt Ridley, The Origins of Virtue : Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation, Penguin USA (1998)
19. Robert Wright, Nonzero : The Logic of Human Destiny, Pantheon Books (1999)

关于爱情、性和婚姻优生，以及生物学遗传的书籍：
2. 柯若寧（Helera Cronin）著，楊玉齡譯，《 螞蟻與孔雀（上）──耀眼羽毛背後的性擇之爭》（ The Ant and the Peacock (Part 1 & 2) : Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today），天下文化。
3. 柯若寧（Helera Cronin）著，楊玉齡譯，《 螞蟻與孔雀（下）──捨自為群的利他之謎》（ The Ant and the Peacock (Part 3) : Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today），天下文化。
3. 賈德．戴蒙（Jared Diamond）著，王道還、廖月娟譯，《第三種猩猩──人類身世與未來》（ The third Chimpanzee : the Evolution and Future of the Human Animal），時報文化出版。
4. 賈德．戴蒙（Jared Diamond）著，王道還譯，《槍炮、病菌與鋼鐵──人類社會的命運》（ Guns, Germs and Steel : The Fates of Human Societies），時報文化出版。
5. 賈德．戴蒙（Jared Diamond）著，王道還譯，《 性趣何來？》（ Why is Sex Fun? : The Evolution of Human Sexuality），天下文化。
6. 麥特．瑞德里（Matt Ridley）著，范昱峰譯，《紅色皇后──性與人性的演化》（ The Red Queen : sex and the evolution of human nature），時報出版。
7. 羅伯．賴特（Robert Wright）著，林淑貞譯，《性．演化．達爾文──人是道德的動物？》（ The Moral Animal : Why We Are the Way We Are : the New Science of Evolutionary Psychology ），張老師文化。
8. 理查．藍翰（Richard Wrangham）和戴爾．彼德森（Dale Peterson）著，林秀梅譯，《雄性暴力──人類社會的亂源》（ Demonic Males : Apes and the Origins of Human Violence），胡挑木。

美国去年很流行的一本书，说是精子里含有快乐激素(Semen acts as an anti-depressant)，女人得到精子快乐，男人失去精子发呆。
文见：
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2457

自从这个科研成果发布后，美国女人惊呼，以后女性是否应该向男子付费。


结果去年美国生育率显著提高了。

文章指出，精子富含抗焦虑物质，女人使用后，不但可以抗焦虑，还能补充多种女人不能合成的物质！女人缺少精子会得多种疾病，包括精神疾病，所以做爱最好不要戴套。
但是男人失去精子，3日内会智力退化。身体疲惫。
Semen acts as an anti-depressant

    * 19:00 26 June 2002
    * Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
    * Raj Persaud

Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate

(Photo: Getty Images)
(Photo: Getty Images)
Tools
digg thisAdd My YahooAdd Google Reader reddit submitNewsvine
Related Articles

    * Depression genes differ in men and women
    * 28 March 2002
    * Brain scans reveal placebo effect in depressed patients
    * 2 January 2002
    * Brain "pacemaker" has long-term effects on depression
    *
    * Search New Scientist
    * Contact us

Web Links

    * Gordon Gallup, State University of New York
    * Archives of Sexual Behavior
    * Indiana University of Pennsylvania

Semen makes you happy. That's the remarkable conclusion of a study comparing women whose partners wear condoms with those whose partners don't.

The study, which is bound to provoke controversy, showed that the women who were directly exposed to semen were less depressed. The researchers think this is because mood-altering hormones in semen are absorbed through the vagina. They say they have ruled out other explanations.

"I want to make it clear that we are not advocating that people abstain from using condoms," says Gordon Gallup, the psychologist at the State University of New York who led the team. "Clearly an unwanted pregnancy or a sexually transmitted disease would more than offset any advantageous psychological effects of semen."
Suicide attempts

His team divided 293 female students into groups depending on how often their partners wore condoms, and assessed their happiness using the Beck Depression Inventory, a standard questionnaire for assessing mood. People who score over 17 are considered moderately depressed.

The team found that women whose partners never used condoms scored 8 on average, those who sometimes used them scored 10.5, those who usually used them scored 15 and those who always used them scored 11.3. Women who weren't having sex at all scored 13.5.

What's more, the longer the interval since they last had sex, the more depressed the women who never or sometimes used condoms got. But the time since the last sexual encounter made no difference to the mood of women who usually or always used condoms.

The team also found that depressive symptoms and suicide attempts were more common among women who used condoms regularly compared with those who didn't. The results will appear in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.

And Gallup told New Scientist that his team already has unpublished data from a larger group of 700 women confirming these findings. In this study, the always-use-condoms group were more depressed than the usually-use-condoms group, suggesting the discrepancy in the smaller study was a sampling error, he says.
Alternative explanations

But is it really the semen that affects women's mood? The researchers say they looked at alternative explanations such as whether women who seldom use condoms took oral contraceptives, how often they had sex, the strength of relationships, and the possibility that having a certain type of personality influenced the decision to use condoms. But none of these factors can explain their findings, they say.

In fact, the results aren't a complete surprise because semen does contain several mood-altering hormones, including testosterone, oestrogen, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, prolactin and several different prostaglandins. Some of these have been detected in a women's blood within hours of exposure to semen.

The question many people will ask is whether oral sex could have the same mood-enhancing effects. "Since the steroids in birth control pills survive the digestion process, I would assume that the same holds true for at least some of the chemicals in semen," Gallup says.

"I understand that among some gay males who have anal intercourse, it is not uncommon to attempt to retain the semen for extended periods of time," he adds. "Suggesting, of course, that there may be psychological effects." But further research will be needed to confirm whether exposure to semen through oral or anal sex really does affect mood in heterosexual or homosexual partners.

But why should semen have such an effect? "It makes no sense to me for this phenomenon to have evolved," says Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist at the Indiana University of Pennsylvania. But Gallup counters that men whose semen promotes long-term mood enhancement might have more chances to indulge in sexual activity.
Printable versionEmail to a friendRSS FeedSyndicate